WHERE DID NOAH'S ARK DOCK
YES IT HAD TO BE A WORLD WIDE FLOOD.One "Jew" web site states there was never a world wide flood, but it was only a flood in one area of the middle east.
The guy writes:
These are the verses most generally used when defending the destruction of the entire earth by Noah's flood. Now first off we know that the earth was not destroyed. Yet, if one is to believe that the flood was universal, they must also believe that the entire world was destroyed at that time. Because that is what is says "I will destroy them with the earth."
///
It does not say the earth was destroyed, it says all flesh was
destroyed. Do not change earth for flesh !!!
\\\
After swapping flesh for earth, he has the basis to contiue his farce:
He continues:
First. Let's look at what Strong's Concordance has to say about the word earth.
In the Old Testament the following is used almost every time. #127: soil; country, earth, ground, husband, land.
#776: a land; common, country, earth, field, ground, land, nations, way, wilderness, world.
///
He goes on for a paragraph telling what the word earth means in strongs and it does not matter if it goes on for a thousand pages. The scriptures does NOT say the earth was destroyed, it states that all flesh was destroyed.
By swapping the word FLESH for EARTH and then looking up all the meanings of Earth, the con has pulled the ol switch-a-roo. It does not say earth, it says all flesh will be destroyed !!!
GENESIS 6:17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.
Flesh (living things) are to be destroyed, not the earth.That is to destroy ALL FESH
All flesh UNDER THE HEAVEN
Some.. NO EVERY THING THAT IS IN THE EARTH SHALL DIE.CAIN
GENESIS 4:14 Cain: you hast driven me out from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth;
* First driven from the face of the earth and
* He shall be a vagabond IN the earth, so of course Cain never took off in a rocketship.
Genesis 4:16 Cain lived in the land of Nod, East of Eden.
Eden is in Iraq about 50 miles north of Kuwait. Any land he could have moved to the east has a sea leavel far below Mt Sinia.
The land of Nod where Cain was sent to is far below the peek of Arat.
The top of Arat was covered by the flood, so the land of Nod was under the flood.
Every one except those on the Ark died so Cain and descendants ceased to exist (unless Noah's sons married his daughters).
Everyone on earth came out of Adam and Eve. Everyone on earth lived between Iran and Iraq.
There was only one race and only one language on earth until the caper at the tower of Babel.
***
The liars begin their farce by changing all flesh was destroyed to the earth was destroyed. If the flood existed a thousand years it would not destroy the earth, it would only make it soggy. The only thing a flood could destroy is living things, and that is exactly what is written...
GENESIS 6:17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.
THE EARTH WAS DESTROYED ?
NO
ALL FLESH WAS DESTROYEDLet's see if it was a local flood or if the whole earth was flooded.***
GEN 7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
GEN 7:20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.#1 The waters would have first covered every thing below the mountains and when it reached the mountains it would have flowed around them.#2 As it rose it would have went around the base of the mountains until it reached the tops and "the mountains were covered ".
WHERE DID NOAH'S ARK DOCK
YES IT HAD TO BE A WORLD WIDE FLOOD.One "Jew" web site states there was never a world wide flood, but it was only a flood in one area of the middle east.
The guy writes:
These are the verses most generally used when defending the destruction
of the entire earth by Noah's flood. Now first off we know that the earth
was not destroyed. Yet, if one is to believe that the flood was
universal, they must also believe that the entire world was destroyed at
that time. Because that is what is says "I will destroy them with the
earth."
///
It does not say the earth was destroyed, it says all flesh was
destroyed. Do not change earth for flesh !!!
\\\
After swapping flesh for earth, he has the basis to contiue his farce:
He continues:
First. Let's look at what Strong's Concordance has to say about the word earth.
In the Old Testament the following is used almost every time. #127: soil;
country, earth, ground, husband, land. #776: a land; common, country,
earth, field, ground, land, nations, way, wilderness, world.
///
He goes on for a paragraph telling what the word earth means in strongs and it does not matter if it goes on for a thousand pages. The scriptures does NOT say the earth was destroyed, it states that all flesh was destroyed.
By swapping the word FLESH for EARTH and then looking up all the meanings of Earth, the con has pulled the ol switch-a-roo. It does not say earth, it says all flesh will be destroyed !!!
GENESIS 6:17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon
the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.
Flesh (living things) are to be destroyed, not the earth.That is to destroy ALL FESH
All flesh UNDER THE HEAVEN
Some.. NO EVERY THING THAT IS IN THE EARTH SHALL DIE.CAINGENESIS 4:14 Cain: you hast driven me out from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth;
* First driven from the face of the earth and
* He shall be a vagabond IN the earth, so of course Cain never took off in a rocketship.
Genesis 4:16 Cain lived in the land of Nod, East of Eden.
Eden is in Iraq about 50 miles north of Kuwait. Any land he could have moved to the east has a sea leavel far below Mt Sinia.
The land of Nod where Cain was sent to is far below the peek of Arat. The top of Arat was covered by the flood, so the land of Nod was under the flood. Every one except those on the Ark died so Cain and descendants ceased to exist (unless Noah's sons married his daughters). Everyone on earth came out of Adam and Eve. Everyone on earth lived between Iran and Iraq. There was only one race and only one language on earth until the caper at the tower of Babel.***The liars begin their farce by changing all flesh was destroyed to the earth was destroyed. If the flood existed a thousand years it would not destroy the earth, it would only make it soggy. The only thing a flood could destroy is living things, and that is exactly what is written...
GENESIS 6:17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.
THE EARTH WAS DESTROYED ?
NO
ALL FLESH WAS DESTROYEDLet's see if it was a local flood or if the whole earth was flooded.***
GEN 7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
GEN 7:20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.#1 The waters would have first covered every thing below the mountains and when it reached the mountains it would have flowed around them.#2 As it rose it would have went around the base of the mountains until it reached the tops and "the mountains were covered ".
#3 When the waters diminished the bottom of the ark settled in the mud at the top of Mt Ararat#4 Up until the time of Noah all people on earth lived between Iran and Iraq. Before the flood could reach above Mt Ararat every thing else on earth would have first been under water first.***Using a little math and laws of physics (rounding off numbers to make it easy), we can prove the ark could not have landed less than 30 ft below the highest point on Mt Ararat. The pictures of the Ark hundreds of feet below the peek of the mountain would have to be a hoax.Of course it could have slid down hundreds of feet, but when Noah and crew were on the deck, the ark would have to have docked at the top of Mt Ararat.( A site with buoyancy data http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/fluidfloating.htm )HOW FAR CAN WE SEE WITH THE NAKED EYE?On a web page pushing tourism in Cleveland Ohio, I found this observation about being human site.
A person on a mountain 5,280 feet high, can see for 96 miles on a clear day.I am not sure about 96 miles, that sounds pretty far, but in the county I live in, we have one high place. It is about 40 miles from Columbus Ohio, and on a clear day you can easily see the tall buildings, so I know you can see at least 40 miles on a clear day.#1 Let's use 50 miles for a round number. THE SIZE OF THE ARKThe length of the ark is 515 ft. and the height is 52 inches and 72 ft wide.#2 Using an assumption, how many feet of the ark would have been under water?THE EARTH, HILLS, MOUNTAINS COVEREDGENESIS 7:18 And the waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and the ark went upon the face of the waters.GENESIS 7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.( Which high hills, ALL the high hills that were under the whole heaven)#3 Which high hills are not under the whole heaven?GENESIS 7:20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.THE BOTTOM OF THE ARK GETS STUCK IN THE MUDGENESIS 7:24 the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days.GENESIS 8:1 God... made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters asswaged;GENESIS 8:2 The fountains of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained;( Fountains of the deep, sounds like under ground springs AND the windows from heaven )GENESIS 8:3 And the waters returned from off the earth continually: and after the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters were abated.GENESIS 8:4 And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.GENESIS 8:5 And the waters decreased continually until the tenth month: in the tenth month, on the first day of the month, were the tops of the mountains seen.* Got stuck in the mud, 7th month, 17th day* The tops of the mountain were seen in the 10th month, the first day.July 15 + Aug 31+ Sept 31 + Oct +1 days = 78 days after being stuck in the mud, they could see THE TOPS OF THE MOUNTAINS.*** The green line represents the part of the ark under water.The ark could not have landed in the places where those joke pictures show.The bottom of the ark could not have been more than 26 ft below the highest peak of Mt Ararat (red line) ( Rounding off and using these numbers)The highest point of Mt Ararat is 17,000 ft above sea level.The ark was 52 ft higha) If 50% of the ark was below water#4 how far from the top of Mt Ararat, could the bottom of the ark have been?* The tops of the mountains could not be seen when Noah got stuck in the mud, but after 78 days he could see the tops of the mountains, therefore Noah was close enough to the tops of the mountains to see them.* Water seeks it's own level.* If 50% of the ark was below water (buoyancy) then 26 ft of the ark would have been below the water line to get stuck on the mountain.* Using these numbers, the bottom of the ark would have been about 26 ft below the highest peak of Mt Ararat. (17,000 -26 = 16,974 above sea level )***WATER DOES NOT RUN UP HILL* During the flood, all the rain that landed on the mountain in the beginning would have ran down hill, until such time as EVERY THING BELOW IT WAS UNDER WATER !
* For the water to "cover the mountains", the top of the water would have to exceed the height of the mountains.
* Before the water could reach the top of the mountains- water seeks it's own level- water runs down hill
Every thing below the tops of the mountain would have to first be covered.
* Even if the water did reach other mountain ranges higher than Ararat, they would not have stopped the flood water.
The water would have went around those mountains in the flat lands / lower elevations.
* The only possible way for the tops of Mt Ararat to have been covered with water is that every other place on earth with a lower elevation was under water FIRST !
And so you know the local flood caper is quite the joke.
GENESIS 7:23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.
GEN 9:18 the sons of were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth
GEN 9:19 the three sons of Noah ... of them was the whole earth over spread.
Every one on earth came from the three sons of Noah (and wives). Unless the sons of Shem were poking their own sisters, the descendants of Shem were produced with the children of Ham and Japeth.
Shem had generations of descendants before the first Israelite was ever born and almost all of Shem's descendants were NON Israelites.
After the first Israelites were created, they produced their descendants by marrying the descendants of Ham and Japeth ... Philistines, Canaanites, Egyptians, Jebusites, Midianites... a whole pot luck of Arabs.
The idea of the existence of some Semitic people is a farce and the bs about there never being a world wide flood is a bald face lie ... unless stupidity or ignorance is the excuse.
#3 When the waters diminished the bottom of the ark settled in the mud at the top of Mt Ararat
#4 Up until the time of Noah all people on earth lived between Iran and Iraq. Before the flood could reach above Mt Ararat every thing else on earth would have first been under water first.
***
Using a little math and laws of physics (rounding off numbers to make it easy), we can prove the ark could not have landed less than 30 ft below the highest point on Mt Ararat.
The pictures of the Ark hundreds of feet below the peek of the mountain would have to be a hoax.
Of course it could have slid down hundreds of feet, but when Noah and crew were on the deck, the ark would have to have docked at the top of Mt Ararat.( A site with buoyancy data http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/fluidfloating.htm )
HOW FAR CAN WE SEE WITH THE NAKED EYE?
On a web page pushing tourism in Cleveland Ohio, I found this observation about being human site.
A person on a mountain 5,280 feet high, can see for 96 miles on a clear day.
I am not sure about 96 miles, that sounds pretty far, but in the county I live in, we have one high place.
It is about 40 miles from Columbus Ohio, and on a clear day you can easily see the tall buildings, so I know you can see at least 40 miles on a clear day.
#1 Let's use 50 miles for a round number.
THE SIZE OF THE ARK
The length of the ark is 515 ft. and the height is 52 inches and 72 ft wide.
#2 Using an assumption, how many feet of the ark would have been under water?
THE EARTH, HILLS, MOUNTAINS COVERED
GENESIS 7:18 And the waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and the ark went upon the face of the waters.
GENESIS 7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
( Which high hills, ALL the high hills that were under the whole heaven)
#3 Which high hills are not under the whole heaven?
GENESIS 7:20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.
THE BOTTOM OF THE ARK GETS STUCK IN THE MUD
GENESIS 7:24 the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days.
GENESIS 8:1 God... made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters asswaged;
GENESIS 8:2 The fountains of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained;( Fountains of the deep, sounds like under ground springs AND the windows from heaven )
GENESIS 8:3 And the waters returned from off the earth continually: and after the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters were abated.
GENESIS 8:4 And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.
GENESIS 8:5 And the waters decreased continually until the tenth month: in the tenth month, on the first day of the month, were the tops of the mountains seen.
* Got stuck in the mud, 7th month, 17th day* The tops of the mountain were seen in the 10th month, the first day.
July 15 + Aug 31+ Sept 31 + Oct +1 days = 78 days after being stuck in the mud, they could see THE TOPS OF THE MOUNTAINS.
***
The green line represents the part of the ark under water.
The ark could not have landed in the places where those joke pictures show.
The bottom of the ark could not have been more than 26 ft below the highest peak of Mt Ararat (red line)
( Rounding off and using these numbers)The highest point of Mt Ararat is 17,000 ft above sea level.
The ark was 52 ft higha) If 50% of the ark was below water
#4 how far from the top of Mt Ararat, could the bottom of the ark have been?* The tops of the mountains could not be seen when Noah got stuck in the mud, but after 78 days he could see the tops of the mountains, therefore Noah was close enough to the tops of the mountains to see them.
* Water seeks it's own level.*
If 50% of the ark was below water (buoyancy) then 26 ft of the ark would have been below the water line to get stuck on the mountain.*
Using these numbers, the bottom of the ark would have been about 26 ft below the highest peak of Mt Ararat. (17,000 -26 = 16,974 above sea level )
***
WATER DOES NOT RUN UP HILL* During the flood, all the rain that landed on the mountain in the beginning would have ran down hill, until such time as EVERY THING BELOW IT WAS UNDER WATER !
* For the water to "cover the mountains", the top of the water would have to exceed the height of the mountains.* Before the water could reach the top of the mountains- water seeks it's own level- water runs down hill
Every thing below the tops of the mountain would have to first be covered.* Even if the water did reach other mountain ranges higher than Ararat, they would not have stopped the flood water. The water would have went around those mountains in the flat lands / lower elevations.
*
The only possible way for the tops of Mt Ararat to have been covered with water is that every other place on earth with a lower elevation was under water FIRST !And so you know the local flood caper is quite the joke.
GENESIS 7:23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.
GEN 9:18 the sons of were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth
GEN 9:19 the three sons of Noah ... of them was the whole earth over spread.
Every one on earth came from the three sons of Noah (and wives). Unless the sons of Shem were poking their own sisters, the descendants of Shem were produced with the children of Ham and Japeth.
Shem had generations of descendants before the first Israelite was ever born and almost all of Shem's descendants were NON Israelites.
After the first Israelites were created, they produced their descendants by marrying the descendants of Ham and Japeth ... Philistines, Canaanites, Egyptians, Jebusites, Midianites... a whole pot luck of Arabs.
Who were the Israelites? Israelite = decendants of a guy named Israel. Israel was a descendant of the Chaldeans/ancient iraquis and Syrians.
The Israelites were not a unique race different than those they fought against, but they were nothing less than a composite of every surrounding nations/people they were commanded to drive out.. that is another story with scriptures from the Torah ("Jew" version and the protestant Bible)
No comments:
Post a Comment